|
|
"Power Corrupts, Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely" |
 |
The
Non-Toxic Times, June 2004
|
--------------------------------------------
Overthrow Of Mullah's
Regime
--------------------------------------------
* * * * The Future Iran * *
* *
--------------------------------------------
* A Chance For Referendum
*
--------------------------------------------
New Iranian Constitution
- Intro
--------------------------------------------
New Iranian Constitution
- Chart
--------------------------------------------
New Iranian Constitution
- Articles
--------------------------------------------
Setting Up Provisional
Government
--------------------------------------------
Download Complete
Constitution
--------------------------------------------
Open Letter To Exiled
Iranians
--------------------------------------------
Grass-Root Community
Building
--------------------------------------------
Massive Attacks Against
Iran
--------------------------------------------
U.S. Likly Military
Strike On Iran
--------------------------------------------
George Bush Is No Santa
Claus
--------------------------------------------
Going Back To The Future
--------------------------------------------
The Threat Of Fundamentalism
--------------------------------------------
International We Had
Enough Day
--------------------------------------------
Iranian Filmmaker Cyrus
Kar
--------------------------------------------
United States - Iran War Plans
--------------------------------------------
* Iran in the Crosshairs
*
--------------------------------------------
The New Russian - Toys
- For
The Ruling Mullahs of Iran
--------------------------------------------
Israel,
Mossad, Iran And A
Nuclear False Flag Attack
--------------------------------------------
The Real AIPAC Spy
Ring Story
It Was All About Iran
--------------------------------------------
Armageddon Gets No Press
US Plan To Nuke Iran
--------------------------------------------
Who's Behind The Coming
War With Iran?
--------------------------------------------
Top Ten War Profiteers
of 2004
--------------------------------------------
U.S. Secret Plans
For Iraq's Oil
--------------------------------------------
* * Depleted
Uranium: * *
The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War
--------------------------------------------
The Separatist - Al-Ahwaz
--------------------------------------------
War On
Iraq: Conceived in Israel
--------------------------------------------
The EU, US, Israel And
Iran
--------------------------------------------
Aren't - THEY - Doing Something?
--------------------------------------------
Foundation Of Iranian
Democracy
--------------------------------------------
Islamic Sharia Court
In Canada
--------------------------------------------
Islam’s Tolerance OR
Hypocrisy
--------------------------------------------
Political Islam VS. Secularism
--------------------------------------------
Muhammad, Prophet
of Doom
--------------------------------------------
Persian Gulf - Vs. -
Arabian Gulf
--------------------------------------------
* Pan-Arabism's
Legacy *
--------------------------------------------
Enroll Your Mayor
In The Abolition
--------------------------------------------
* It Takes Only One
Senator *
--------------------------------------------
Foreknowledge Of Natural
Disaster
--------------------------------------------
Political Right - Left
And The Middle
--------------------------------------------
Iranian Character And
Personality
--------------------------------------------
1979 - Evidence of Iran
Revolution
--------------------------------------------
Millionaire Mullahs - Paul
Klebnikov
--------------------------------------------
Wangari Maathai - Nobel Lecture
--------------------------------------------
The Iroquois
Nations Constitution
--------------------------------------------
Anglo-US Inc Intelligence-Secrecy
--------------------------------------------
Anglo-US Inc Pursuit of
Democracy
--------------------------------------------
Mercenaries & Soldiers of Fortune
--------------------------------------------
Geneva Conventions, 1949 &
1977
--------------------------------------------
Appointment of John Negroponte
--------------------------------------------
Introduction To Iran / Persia
--------------------------------------------
Perfectly Legal - By David Johnston
--------------------------------------------
What Is Instant Run-Off
Voting
--------------------------------------------
The Non-Toxic Times,
Nov. 2004
--------------------------------------------
The Non-Toxic Times,
Oct. 2004
--------------------------------------------
The Non-Toxic Times,
Sep. 2004
--------------------------------------------
The Non-Toxic
Times, Aug. 2004
--------------------------------------------
The Non-Toxic Times,
July 2004
--------------------------------------------
The Non-Toxic Times,
June 2004
--------------------------------------------
Re: Terror - Racial Profile
Yourself
--------------------------------------------
Terror In The Skies,
Again?
--------------------------------------------
Worlds' Defenseless Public
--------------------------------------------
Univ. Declaration of
Human Rights
--------------------------------------------
The Mercury Scandal
--------------------------------------------
Alzheimer & Mad Cow Disease
--------------------------------------------
Worldwide Food Irradiation
--------------------------------------------
Depleted Uranium 236
- Transcript
--------------------------------------------
Depleted Uranium 236 -
Reports
--------------------------------------------
Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey
--------------------------------------------
Arundhati Roy in San
Francisco
--------------------------------------------
Arundhati Roy And Howard Zinn
--------------------------------------------
Do Turkeys Enjoy Thanksgiving?
--------------------------------------------
April 25, March for Women's
Rights
--------------------------------------------
Those Friendly Iranians
--------------------------------------------
A Letter To Mankind -
By Ali Sina
--------------------------------------------
Isaac Newton And
The Coming Invasion Of Iran
--------------------------------------------
Pentagon Zionists, AIPEC
& Israel
--------------------------------------------
Neocons Blast Bush's
Inaction
--------------------------------------------
The World of Mega-Terrorism
--------------------------------------------
Iran Downfall - And
Jimmy Carter
--------------------------------------------
Iranian Regime Downfall
- 1979
--------------------------------------------
Iranian Regime Downfall
- 1953
--------------------------------------------
* Mullahs' Credibility & Legitimacy *
--------------------------------------------
Islamic Republic's
Torture Masters
--------------------------------------------
Islamic Republic's Job
Opportunity
--------------------------------------------
Mullahs' Election Results
From Iran
--------------------------------------------
Propagating Seeds of Democracy
--------------------------------------------
Daring To Dream of Democracy
--------------------------------------------
William Blum
Books And Essays
--------------------------------------------
* The Sorrows of Empire
*
--------------------------------------------
Race & Slavery In The
Middle East
--------------------------------------------
Sunni & Shiite Ruling Mullahs
--------------------------------------------
The Goal of Sunni
& Shiite Mullahs
--------------------------------------------
Terrorism, Supply &
Demand
--------------------------------------------
England's Royal Gift
To Mullahs
--------------------------------------------
The Rise & Fall of
Political Islam
--------------------------------------------
Religions Are Major Global
Threat
--------------------------------------------
1 - Genocide, By Europe
& U.S.A
--------------------------------------------
2 - Genocide, By Europe
& U.S.A
--------------------------------------------
3 - Genocide, By Europe
& U.S.A
--------------------------------------------
04 Toppled Dictators Photo
Album
--------------------------------------------
Ralph Nader Stands with the People
--------------------------------------------
Letter To The Brave Activists
--------------------------------------------
Letter To The People of
The World
--------------------------------------------
Letter To President George
W. Bush
--------------------------------------------
Letter To Terrorist Mullahs
--------------------------------------------
Daily Mail - The Murderous
Mullahs
--------------------------------------------
Letter To The American People,
Richard Cheney, J. Dennis Hastert & Members of The 108th U.S. Congress
--------------------------------------------
Mullahs In Strong Position
To Steer
--------------------------------------------
Mullahs,
Al Qaeda & Hezbollah
--------------------------------------------
Officially Launched
"Holy Terror"
--------------------------------------------
Mullah's Plan To Force
U.S.A. Out
--------------------------------------------
Mullahs Delivering Armageddon
--------------------------------------------
Mullah's Global Nuclear
Ambitions
--------------------------------------------
Mullahs Human Rights Practices
--------------------------------------------
Going Soft On Iran
--------------------------------------------
Tariq Ali vs. Christopher
Hitchens
--------------------------------------------
Stalinist Mullahs
--------------------------------------------
Americans Appeasing
Evil
--------------------------------------------
Richard Clarke Top 7 Questions
--------------------------------------------
What Is A Billion And A Trillion
--------------------------------------------
The True Origins Of
Christianity
--------------------------------------------
Definition of Patriotism
--------------------------------------------
Definition of Family
Values
--------------------------------------------
Definition of Choice & Diversity
--------------------------------------------
List of Nonfiction Informative
Books
--------------------------------------------
New Voting Machines
For Florida
--------------------------------------------
Progressive Internet Links
--------------------------------------------
Major - Media Links
--------------------------------------------
Freedom House Contact
Page
--------------------------------------------
Middle East
Crisis & News Links
--------------------------------------------
US Grantmaking Foundations
--------------------------------------------
United States Think
Tank Links
--------------------------------------------
International Information
Links
--------------------------------------------
United States
Government Links
--------------------------------------------
World's Newspapers
Sites Links
--------------------------------------------
World Financial Information
Links
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
These
days it seems there is always a new public health crisis about which
to worry. SARS, West Nile, mad cow… the list goes on and on.
It seems as if there is a new illness every week to strike fear into
otherwise healthy hearts. Certainly diseases like these are no laughing
matter. Indeed, they can be very serious. But do they rank among the
most dangerous epidemics we face? I don't think so. I think that title
may very well belong to the asthma epidemic no one is talking about.
And this time, it's personal.
A long time ago, in a life far, far away, I lived in New York City
but ran a company in Vermont. Summers added yet another layer of confusion
to my residential schizophrenia. Then, I'd often find my family at
the ancestral Hollender house on Long Island, and my working life
about 45 minutes south of Canada.
So it was then in 1995, I was working in Burlington while my wife
and children vacationed by the sea. My son, Alex, then 5 years old,
had a rough spring. He wasn't so much sick as he was simply sickly.
Nobody knew what was going on. We only knew he wasn't feeling well.
We took him to doctors, but none could find anything wrong with him.
In spite of the fact that he was slowly getting sicker, there weren't
any medical answers. Something was clearly not right. But nobody knew
what was wrong.
One day, while I was working at the office in Vermont, my wife called
from Long Island, frantic with fear. Alex was having trouble breathing.
I could actually hear him in the background gasping for air. While
my wife rushed him to a nearby hospital, I did what any father would
do. I completely panicked, raced instantly to the airport at a clearly
illegal rate of speed, threw every credit card I owned at the charter
desk, and actually hired a private plane to fly me to the tiny airport
near the hospital.
By the time I arrived, Alex was breathing and recovering from what
had been diagnosed, to my utter shock, as an asthma attack. Asthma?
My son has asthma? It was awful to think about, but at least we had
an answer, unsettling though it might be. Armed with this knowledge,
we went to a specialist in the city. Not knowing what I did for a
living, the doctor proceeded to give us a long lecture on how the
key to treatment wasn't drugs but creating a healthy home. My wife
and I listened dutifully as she went on and on about dust mites, household
cleaners, indoor air pollution, and all the other issues around which
my mail-order company revolved!
Today, Alex is 14 and doing well. We have to be careful, watch for
colds and especially coughs, carry emergency medication, and the like,
but we're far from alone. Because asthma has reached epidemic proportions
in the United States, many families know the pain and fear of this
terrible disease. And it's getting worse with every collective breath
we take.
For more than 20 years, the rates of emergency room visits, hospitalization,
and death caused by asthma have been rising, especially among our
kids. Between 1980 and 1994, the incidence of asthma among pre-school
aged children rose 160%, more than twice the rate of the overall population.
Today, the disease is the leading chronic illness of childhood. Some
nine million children have it, or nearly one in 13, and it costs them
14 million missed school days each year and our nation $3.2 billion
to treat it.
Our kids aren't the only ones facing this challenge either. The Centers
for Disease Control estimates that 7.5% of all adults have asthma,
too. That's some 16 million people sick and some $9.5 billion dollars
in extra health care costs.
What's producing all this asthma? You name it. Experts point to all
kinds of causes. Air pollution. Car exhaust. Factory emissions. Mold.
Dust mites. Cockroach wastes. Tobacco smoke. Even global warming.
(Scientists say that as the atmosphere warms, bad-air days increase
and more species of molds are able to spread and prosper.)
Cleaning products have been implicated, too. This item, of course,
is of great interest to me. Given all the contributions toxic chemical
cleaners make to indoor air pollution, I've wondered for years if
they might be contributing to asthma as well. Recently, studies have
begun to prove that, in fact, they are.
A study of 4,521 women conducted at the Municipal Institute of Medical
Research in Barcelona, Spain, for example, found a strong correlation
between asthma and employment as professional cleaners, and attributed
25% of the reported cases to this work. A Michigan State University
study of work-related asthma cases in four states discovered that
12% were strongly associated with exposure to cleaning products.
That cleaning products cause asthma is important to know, but it's
not the real story. Nor do I think that asthma is the real disease.
To me, the real disease is a world out of balance. Asthma, as horrible
as it is, is merely a symptom, and one of the key signs that we are
packing our planet with poisons faster than the bodies of our children
and ourselves can figure out how to cope.
The big issue is not that asthma sufferers have gone from being a
minor statistic to being a major epidemic, but that something has
made this terrible thing happen. Something new. Something that wasn't
here in all the centuries before, when asthma was relatively rare.
That's the real problem, and it's clear that the cause is the modern
world itself. The technologies created in the last 75 years are the
only things that weren't here before. What else could it be?
There are those who would argue that I am painting a complex issue
with overly broad brush strokes, and I agree. But I think that broad
strokes are exactly what we need here, because asthma isn't being
caused by any one thing. It's being caused by many things, and every
one of them is directly related to our culture's cavalier attitude
toward technology, its lack of dedicated attention to environmental
concerns, and a failure to embrace preventative health care strategies.
The answer to something as big as all that must be, by the very nature
of the problem, equally large. In order to be effective, it must address
seemingly unrelated issues and solve a variety of different types
of problems all at once. It must fix asthma even as it stops global
warming and reduces the production of dangerous chemicals. It must
clean our water and our air, even as it cleans our bodies. It must
preserve endangered species even as it heals the ozone layer.
Fortunately, there is an answer that big and broad. It is called,
as longtime readers may have already guessed, the Precautionary Principle
(see ). This regulatory
idea says that no activity or technology, no matter what it is, can
proceed until and unless its proponents have proven, beyond all doubt,
that it won't cause harm to people or the biosphere. Unlike current
strategies that attempt to close the proverbial barn door after all
the horses have escaped, the Precautionary Principle fixes very nearly
everything that ails us in one fell swoop.
It's what we need, and it's what we need now rather than later. If
there's a silver lining to all of this asthma, to all of this unfathomable
pain and suffering experienced by our children and our families, my
own included, it's that it may be the thing that finally shakes some
much needed sense into our governments and industries. It may be the
thing that brings us together to solve our problems and move us into
an era of sustainability and true prosperity. Illness among those
we love is a powerful motivator. (Just ask the woman at the Burlington
Airport charter desk.) Maybe this is it; I don't know. But I do know
it's so important that I'm willing to hold my breath while I wait
for it to happen.
For more information about asthma visit the Asthma and Allergy Foundation
of America at
or the Allergy & Asthma Network Mothers of Asthmatics at .
|
 |
| back to top |
 |
|
[Editors
note: As this issue was written, USDA Secretary Ann Veneman announced
that the department was rescinding the new interpretations of the
National Organic Standards rules that are described in the following
article. This decision was the direct result of a massive outpouring
of public protest against these changes. Rather than remove this article
from The
Non-Toxic Times, we've chosen to leave it in place as a cautionary
tale that reveals some of the ways in which good regulations can be
undermined by poor decisions made out of the public eye.]
Implemented in 2002, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National
Organic Standards were hailed as a landmark achievement. Thanks to
public support, the finalized regulations governing the production
and labeling of organic foods resisted dilution by agribusiness and
replaced a patchwork of state laws with a single national standard
that preserved all the important attributes traditionally associated
with organics. By and large, everyone was happy with it. Until, that
is, the USDA recently began “interpreting” the rules.
The National Organic Standards require that any food product labeled
“organic” maintain certification that it is:
- Free
of genetic modification
- Processed
without irradiation
- Grown
without the use of processed sewage sludge as fertilizer
- Grown
without the use of synthetic pesticides and/or herbicides
In addition, organic meats must come from animals that have been:
- Raised
humanely and with access to pasture
- Raised
on organic feed
- Raised
without the use of antibiotics and/or growth hormones
Of course, rules are one thing. Interpreting them is something else
altogether, and it's this part of the process that has recently been
sounding many activists' alarm bells. After the hard-won victory that
preserved the key hallmarks of organic foods in spite of intense pressure
from conventional food manufacturers, certain provisions in the standards
are being watered down in the face of new National Organic Program
(NOP) guidance statements from the USDA. Here's a look at the three
areas of current concern:
- A
new fishmeal guidance statement dated April 28th says that fishmeal
can be fed to cattle being raised for organic beef. Fishmeal is
a common source of protein in traditional cattle operations, but,
as is the case with the fish from which it's obtained, this meal
is often contaminated with mercury, PCBs, and other persistent
toxins that tend to accumulate in animal fatty tissues. NOP rules
say that an organic beef cow's diet must consist of organic forage
and feeds, but that supplements are allowed to a certain extent
in order to improve nutritional balance of cattle diets. The only
stipulation is that these supplements must be “natural,”
which is defined as being derived from mineral, plant, or animal
matter that has not undergone a synthetic process. Fishmeal meets
this standard, and while technically legal under the rule, activists
say that the use of fishmeal as a cattle feed supplement violates
the spirit and intent of the standards, and that the meat from
beef cows which have been fed fishmeal possibly contaminated with
bioaccumulative poisons should not receive the organic label.
- A
new pesticide guidance statement will allow farmers to apply synthetic
chemicals to organic crops in the form of so-called “inerts”
so long as their farm's certifying agent is not aware that the
legally allowed formulas being used on the farm contain them.
Here's how it works: As part of the NOP certifying procedure,
certifying agents work with farmers to assure that their product
can be legally labeled organic. This work includes making sure
farmers don't use any synthetic chemical pesticides on their crops.
Instead, farmers are allowed to use specified pest and weed control
compounds obtained from natural ingredients. Pest and weed control
products with these non-synthetic materials as their active ingredients
are permitted on organic farms so long as these products do not
also contain any so-called inert ingredients that appear on official
EPA registries named Inert Lists 1, 2, and 3.
Inert ingredients are those ingredients not directly related to
a pesticide formula's killing function. They include things like
carrier, dispersal, and drying agents, which are added to a formula
to make it easier to use, faster to take effect, longer-lasting,
etc. Unfortunately, from a biological standpoint, inerts are often
anything but. They are frequently as toxic as a product's active
ingredients and include known hazards like formaldehyde and toluene.
A new NOP guidance statement from the USDA says that farmers can
use any product on their crops so long as it does not:
- Contain
banned active ingredients or EPA Inert List 1 ingredients
(both of which are legally required to be listed on product
labels)
- And
does not, to their knowledge, contain ingredients found on
EPA Inert lists 2 and 3 (which do not legally have to be listed)
In other words, as long as a farmer and his certifier have tried
to find out what List 2 and 3 inerts a product contains, they
can use that product, regardless of whether or not they were able
to get a satisfactory answer about the presence of any banned
inerts. Here's what the official statement says: “If the
certifying agent and producer, after reasonable effort (contacting
the manufacturer, EPA, and other USDA accredited certifying agents)
are unable to ascertain whether inerts in a pesticide are allowed
under the NOP, the certifying agent will approve that part of
the organic production system plan.” The problem here, of
course, is that manufacturers zealously guard unlisted ingredients
under the guise of protecting proprietary information. Phone calls
to the manufacturer or the EPA are highly unlikely to provide
further information on a product formula. Activists fear the end
result will be banned chemicals being used freely on organic crops
as manufacturers refuse to disclose formula ingredients and agribusiness
producers take advantage of this silence and the loophole that
exploits it.
- The
third troubling development concerns the use of antibiotics and
synthetic hormones on dairy cows. The USDA recently issued a guidance
statement that says individual cows used in organic milk production
can be treated with any kind of drug or synthetic hormone. Milk
obtained from these treated cows, however, may not be sold as
organic for 12 months following any treatment. Unfortunately,
bovine pharmaceuticals tend to bioaccumulate, which means they
easily build up in animal fatty tissues over time and are primarily
released via (you guessed it) milk production. In addition, the
ruling means that any cow can be “converted” to an
organic milk producer after a 12-month waiting period, regardless
of the quantity and type of drugs or hormones it may have received
over its life. This could encourage split-operation factory farms
that shift animals back and forth between organic and non-organic
production. It will also mean that consumers will no longer enjoy
a guarantee that their organic milk is free of drug and hormone
residues as the national standards intended.
Rather than adopt the Precautionary Principle, which favors caution,
USDA officials apparently decided to place any burdens of proof of
organic purity on the public rather than the producers. Fortunately,
as we mentioned above, public pressure from the nation's 30 million
organic product consumers and the many organizations that represent
their interests caused the agency to rethink this decision and rescind
the new guidance statements. Continued vigilance, however, will likely
be required to ensure that the National Organic Program remains strong.
To stay abreast of the latest news and information, visit the Organic
Consumers Association at .
|
 |
| back to top |
 |
|
If
there's one thing that's certain in our uncertain world it's that
there's no shortage of odors in the modern home. From dinner gone
wrong to pets gone unwashed, there's usually something funky fouling
up the domestic olfactory landscape and wrinkling our sensitive noses.
No wonder air freshener sales in the U.S. rose 7.3% in 2002 to $1.67
billion. These products effortlessly cover up odorous offenses. No
fuss. Just fragrance. That and some serious health hazards, as a new
study has found when the chemicals in these products react with a
common indoor air pollutants.
The study was conducted at the EPA's National Risk Management Research
Laboratory and published in the May 15, 2004 edition of Environmental
Science and Technology (Volume 38, No. 10, pages 2737–2745).
Researchers tested air freshening units that plug into electrical
sockets and automatically release aromatic compounds over time to
“freshen” room air.
These fragrance compounds include substances called pinene and limonene.
Scientists found that pinene and limonene easily react with ozone,
a common air pollutant, to create formaldehyde and a variety of related
chemicals that have been implicated in respiratory conditions.
While ozone is a valuable component of the upper atmosphere (where
it shields the Earth's surface from harmful solar radiation); yet
at ground level it's considered a pollutant. Ozone is created when
hydrocarbons from automobile exhaust react with sun light. It is also
sometimes intentionally added to indoor environments by ozone generators,
which release controlled amounts of ozone that oxidize indoor air
pollutants.
Scientists testing air fresheners in a sealed room-sized test chamber
found that the formaldehyde-forming reactions could occur when ozone
levels reach that of a room whose windows have been opened on a high-ozone
day. Mixing air freshener chemicals and ozone at typical levels resulted
in a concentration of particles of formaldehyde-related compounds
of approximately 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air. (For comparison,
a smoky room will contain 100 micrograms or more of particles per
cubic meter.) Scientists believe that every 10 microgram increase
in atmospheric levels of particles result in a 1% increase in deaths
from respiratory conditions like asthma.
The 50 microgram level reported in the study is close to the EPA's
outdoor particle limit and is one that researchers equated to the
kind of volatile exposure that might occur after painting a room.
However, they noted that painting a room is a one-time event. Plug-in
air fresheners, on the other hand, are constantly releasing their
deodorizing agents, so toxic exposures that occur when these compounds
react with ozone are chronic in nature.
Indoor air quality experts recommend against using air fresheners
or room deodorizes of any kind. In general, these products use chemicals
to cover-up odors, and in some cases even reduce the ability of the
nose to smell. Since they do nothing to remove the source of the offensive
odors, air fresheners must also be reapplied frequently, which increases
exposure risk to the chemicals they contain, many of which either
have a dubious safety record or remain untested for human health effects.
Toxins found in air fresheners and room deodorizers include napthalene,
phenol, cresol, dichlorobenzene, and xylene. These and other air freshener
chemicals have been implicated in cancer, neurological damage, reproductive
and developmental disorders, and other conditions. The compounds in
air fresheners, particularly the synthetic fragrances they contain,
can also aggravate asthma and/or trigger attacks.
Instead, keep your home's air smelling fresh by identifying and removing
the sources of any bad odors. Use natural minerals like baking soda
and borax to control common odor sources like trash cans and to deodorize
when you clean. Keep windows open as much as possible to let bad air
out and good air in. If odors are still troubling, invest in an air
purifier with activated carbon filtration, a strategy that can remove
odors. Ozone generators are not recommended. To scent indoor air,
place a drop of a natural essential oil, like lavender or mint, on
a light bulb, or add a dozen drops to a bowl of water placed on a
radiator. You can also boil fragrant dried herbs in a pot of water
to release a fresh smell. A natural mineral called zeolite is available
in packets that will absorb odors when hung in problem areas like
musty basements and closets. You can also make your own sprays from
essential oils and other safe, natural ingredients. For recipes and
more information, we recommend the book Better Basics for the Home,
by Annie Berthold-Bond from Three Rivers Press.
|
 |
| back to top |
 |
|
For
years, the problem of plastics in the sea has been of plastics we
could see. Six-pack rings strangled wildlife, old nets snared birds
and other creatures, small bits and pieces clogged harbors, and garbage
ruined our days at the beach. While these and other plastic perils
are certainly nothing to ignore, they might not be our biggest one.
Of more concern may be what scientists say is happening to these oceans
of plastic. They say it's breaking down into microscopic fragments
that are drowning the sea.
As substances go, plastics are fairly fantastic. Their properties
are often unique, their uses nearly limitless. But many of the reasons
our civilization is so fond of them are the same reasons they've become
such a bane: For all practical purposes plastics are permanent. Because
these synthetic materials do not occur in nature, nature never evolved
a process to biodegrade them into harmless compounds.
Plastics don't disappear. Instead, they simply break apart under the
influence of sunlight, water, and abrasion into smaller and smaller
pieces. That piece of old Styrofoam that looks like its decomposing
isn't at all. It's simply falling apart into trillions and trillions
of microscopic bits of Styrofoam.
And therein lies what researchers have now identified as a problem
of unknown dimension: The world's oceans are filling with invisible
bits of plastic. According to a study conducted at England's University
of Plymouth and published in the May edition of the journal Science,
the seven seas are swimming with polymer particles.
Scientists examined 20 sites around the British Isles and found microscopic
bits of plastic contaminating almost every soil sample they obtained.
From apparently clean beach sand to mud in tidal estuaries and sediments
on sea floors some 30 feet beneath the surface, unseen bits of plastic
were lurking everywhere.
The researchers looked for nine different kinds of plastic that were
easy to chemically identify in minute amounts, including polyester,
acrylic and nylon. What they found were polymer fibers as small as
20 microns in length, fragments about 75% smaller than the smallest
grains of beach sand. These fibers were embedded in sands and soils
and even found inside plankton.
The scientists were also able to ascertain that the flood of plastics
filling the seas has been increasing for at least 40 years. Since
the 1960s, merchant ships have voluntarily trailed garbage can-sized
filters behind them as they plied the ocean's waters. By comparing
the current contents of these filters to those of archived filters,
researchers were able to show that the number of invisible plastic
pieces has tripled over the course of the last generation. Further,
since the study's methods couldn't measure plastic fragments smaller
than 20 microns, experts said the results, in all likelihood, underreported
the actual amount of plastics microscopically drifting in ocean waters.
Currently, scientists aren't sure what all this means for the world
and its wildlife, human included. The short answer might be nothing,
but that's far from a certainty. As part of the project, researchers
put some of the fragments in tanks containing tiny crustaceans, barnacles,
and lugworms and found that they were readily eaten. Whether or not
such materials accumulate in the food chain to eventually create some
type of toxic effect remains to be seen, but previous research has
shown that larger, one millimeter-sized pieces of plastic readily
absorb toxins from ocean waters and can poison animals that ingest
them.
The news that microscopic pieces of plastic are polluting the oceans
is just part of a recent tide of discomforting news about the environment
that covers 71% of the Earth's surface. According to recent reports
from both the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy and the Pew Oceans Commission,
the world's oceans are in poor health as a result of human pressures.
Water quality is falling; coastal development pressures are increasing
(some 37 million people have moved to U.S. shore regions in the last
30 years); populations of whales and large fish, like sharks and marlins,
have declined by 90%; only 22% of smaller fisheries are being harvested
sustainably; and invasive species are causing a number of negative
effects.
To combat this, both organizations have recommended a sweeping series
of regulatory changes in the way the world's oceans are managed, and
a dramatic increase in funding. For more information about these reports
and their suggested plans for a rescue at sea, visit
and .
|
 |
| back to top |
 |
|
It's
shaping up to be a hot season in more ways than one. Across the country,
summer's underway, and so are the heat waves, wildfires, and droughts
that experts tell us may become more frequent and severe unless we
take firm action on climate change. And, of course, it's also an election
year, which means there's more than the usual amount of political
heat being generated. That makes it a perfect time to share two web
sites we've discovered. One offers November-centric discussions of
the nation's big eco-issues. And the other offers an e-newsletter
chock full of hot-and-we-do-mean-hot-off-the-press stories.
Our first stop is a new blog from Island Press, one of the world's
leading publishers of environmental books. The new site is promising
to serve as an election year eco-forum that provides what its sponsor
describes as “candid analysis” of the top environmental
issues facing the United States from a variety of experts. A look
at the blog shows how it will work: Contributors post an initial series
of remarks to which readers then respond. Like many other blogs, responses
generate responses, including follow-up posts from the expert themselves.
The result, in this case, should be an interestingly open, on-going
dialogue about the state of the environment and what we should do
about it. It's also a great chance for web surfers to engage in “conversations”
with not only their fellow concerned citizens, but also noted authorities
and experts with whom they might never otherwise have any contact.
So far the site seems off to a slow start with only an initial offering
of commentary about hybrid cars from Joseph J. Romm, author of The
Hype About Hydrogen, but these kinds of sites take time to develop.
If Island Press keeps its promises, we have high hopes for this web
site. Participation is what will make it tick. If you'd like to see
what it has to say and add your two cents worth (and maybe even more!)
visit .
Our second site offers a free monthly e-mail newsletter of climate
change news. With the summer looking like it's going to be a hot one
and the new Hollywood blockbuster The Day After Tomorrow bringing
the issue of global warming to the dramatic attention of moviegoers
everywhere, the greenhouse effect is a burning issue that's likely
to achieve greater prominence. eCarbon News will keep you on
top of the latest developments with what can only be called an exhaustive
monthly digest of climate change news from around the world. From
promising new technologies and upcoming conferences to the latest
scientific studies and diplomatic initiatives, eCarbon News
has it all in a summary of coverage that's the most complete we've
ever seen on the subject. Each issue contains a brief summary of each
news item and a link that will take readers to the actual news report
itself and things like on-line copies of research reports, conference
registration information and other relevant resources. If that sounds
altogether cool to you, beat the heat to .
|
 |
| back to top |
 |
|
|
It's
been said so often, it's become a cliché…Kids are the future.
In the realm of marketing, however, that statement is all too often
translated as “kids are the future of consumerism.”
It's a disturbing little creed that's created an entire advertising
subculture dedicated to doing everything it can to undermine parental
protections and turn our children into unhealthy overconsumers at
all costs. Fortunately, a new book is exposing this harrowing hard
sell and helping parents fight back.
Consuming Kids: The Hostile Takeover of Childhood, by Susan
E. Linn, New Press, 2004 examines and exposes what is perhaps the
most insidious brand of marketing to ever come down the media pike:
Advertising aimed at children, the most vulnerable audience of all.
Having mined just about every other consumer demographic they can
find for new customers, corporations of all kinds are now turning
their attention to this final frontier with alarming vigor, turning
what was once a marketing backwater into a $15 billion a year industry.
Author,
psychologist, and children's advocate Susan Linn takes readers on
a no-holds-barred, behind-the-scenes tour of a world that sees kids
as just another target ripe for the picking. Though concerned parents
may try to set limits at home and away, commercial forces are working
overtime to sabotage these efforts with messages children haven't
the savvy to resist. From picture books featuring brand characters
to ads aimed at adults but embedded with subtle messages for children,
the dangers are everywhere, and they're placing our children's health
and welfare at grave risk. Comprehensive without being dull, and
passionate without turning preachy, Linn casts a highly critical
eye on marketers and their methods while delivering a compelling
blend of real-life stories from marketing's front lines, childhood
development theories, cutting edge research data, the self-serving
perspectives of the marketing executives themselves, and more. Along
the way, you'll learn about concepts like the nag factor, pester
power, jolts-per-minute, and even something called prenatal marketing.
The
result is a fairly scathing indictment of an amoral industry exploiting
children for profit, and a persuasive case that something needs
to be done to stop it. To that end, Linn also shows us what we can
do to save our kids from what she calls the “marketing maelstrom.”
It's important knowledge from an important book that we think everyone
with children should read.
|
|
Each
month we research our extensive library and network of experts to
bring you important tips, resources and news about the issues that
affect the health of your home, family and the environment. As the
leading natural household products brand and an authority on these
issues, we strive to provide helpful and factual information that
you just won't find anywhere else! And, because we know how busy
life can be, our e-newsletter is fun and easy to read.
Subscribe
to the Non-Toxic Times for ideas, news and resources for a clean
home, a healthy family, and a safer world. Sign-up
for The Non-Toxic Times:
|
| back
to top |
Non-Toxic
Times Archive |
 |
 |
|
Anti-Spam |
 |
| |
®
© Copyright 1995 - 2008 - Earth's Common Sense Think Tank -
All Rights Reserved |
| |
|
| |
P.O. Box 607 - New York - NY 10021-0013 - U.S.A. |
|
Tree Huggers of America, An Alliance of Non-Religious, Sensible Concerned Citizens, Advocates of Reason, Rational And Common Sense. treehuggersofamerica.org
"Love And Live" album exhibit a wide variety of musical styles and forms, incorporating the influences of many different techniques, genre and cultures, from pulsating, tropical grooves, jazz, rhythm & blues melodies, to thrilling dance pieces and soft romantic love songs. www.pbcrecords.com
"Adore Me" album is written from an empowered female point of view, embodying the sweet influences of seductive, erotic and tantalizing musical styles, with which it entertains, heals and relieves. www.pbcrecords.com
PBC Films, is a non-profit, publicly funded enlightening documentary film producing organization, currently working on a film, which will expose and shame those whom are benefiting from Human Trafficking, Female & Child Slavery.www.pbcfilms.com
Venus Project Foundation, is a Charitable Non-Profit 501(c)(3) Organization, working to fund and facilitate; human rights, female rights and equality, environmental protection methods, arts and educational projects. www.venusproject.org













|